As of February 15, 2025, there is no publicly available information regarding a legal case or direct dispute between Judge Philip P. Mariani and Judge Christopher P. Yates. Both individuals serve as judges on the Michigan Court of Appeals and have collaborated on multiple cases, co-authoring opinions and contributing to the state’s judicial system.
Professional Backgrounds
Judge Christopher P. Yates was appointed to the Michigan Court of Appeals on April 18, 2022, by Governor Gretchen Whitmer. Prior to his appointment, Judge Yates served as a judge in the 17th Circuit Court in Kent County, Michigan. His extensive legal career includes experience in both private practice and public service, providing him with a comprehensive understanding of the law.
Judge Philip P. Mariani joined the Michigan Court of Appeals on March 15, 2024, also appointed by Governor Gretchen Whitmer. Before his tenure on the appellate court, Judge Mariani had a distinguished career in the legal field, with roles that encompassed both litigation and judicial responsibilities. His appointment added significant value to the court, given his depth of experience and legal acumen.
Collaborative Judicial Work
Judges Yates and Mariani have worked together on several panels within the Michigan Court of Appeals, jointly authoring opinions on various cases. Their collaborative efforts reflect a professional relationship focused on upholding the law and ensuring justice. Some notable cases they have presided over together include:
-
In re Philpot Estate: In this unpublished opinion, the panel, including Judges Yates and Mariani, affirmed the lower court’s decision regarding the estate matters of the Philpot family. The opinion was issued per curiam, indicating a unanimous decision by the judges on the panel.
-
In re Mat: This published opinion addressed complex legal issues surrounding the case. Judges Yates and Mariani, along with their colleague, provided a thorough analysis, leading to the affirmation of the lower court’s ruling.
-
In re B Heinz Minor: The panel, comprising Judges Yates and Mariani, reviewed the case concerning the minor, B Heinz. Their per curiam opinion upheld the decisions made by the lower court, reflecting their commitment to child welfare and legal integrity.
-
People of MI v. Robert Anthony Sonderman: In this criminal case, Judges Yates and Mariani were part of the panel that delivered an unpublished opinion. The court’s decision provided clarity on the legal issues presented, affirming the lower court’s judgment.
-
People of MI v. Shane David Layer: This case involved serious criminal charges, and the panel, including Judges Yates and Mariani, issued an unpublished opinion. Their decision reinforced the principles of justice and due process.
-
In re Johnson/Thomas/Fofana Minors: The judges reviewed matters concerning the welfare of minors in this unpublished opinion. Their collective judgment aimed to serve the best interests of the children involved, affirming the lower court’s findings.
-
People of MI v. Maxxim Balthazar Wells: In this case, the panel, including Judges Yates and Mariani, addressed sentencing issues. Their per curiam opinion provided guidance on the considerations necessary for sentencing, particularly concerning juvenile defendants.
Judicial Elections and Tenure
Both judges have secured their positions through the electoral process. In the general election held on November 5, 2024, incumbent Judges Christopher P. Yates and Philip Mariani were re-elected to the Michigan 3rd District Court of Appeals. The election results were as follows:
-
Christopher P. Yates: Received 52.2% of the votes, totaling 722,287 votes.
-
Philip Mariani: Received 47.8% of the votes, totaling 660,828 votes.
These results reflect the confidence that the electorate has in their judicial capabilities and their commitment to upholding the law.
Conclusion
Judges Philip P. Mariani and Christopher P. Yates have demonstrated a strong professional rapport, collaborating on numerous cases to deliver justice in the state of Michigan. Their joint efforts in authoring opinions and their re-election to the Michigan Court of Appeals underscore their dedication to the legal profession and their unwavering commitment to public service.
